It hit me like a ton of bricks while jogging in the park. Sure, light exists. I was surrounded by it, I experienced it first hand. But this silly notion of photons as the bundles of energy that give us light…well, that’s just superstition. And hence my deconversion from a faith in mass-less blobs of nothingness to an emotionally healthy level of disbelief.
I had been indoctrinated since my first physics class. The professor stood up there and spoon fed me the same theories of light that he was fed since he was a young physics student. I was so taken by his scientific expertise that I never thought to question a word of it. And so this vicious cycle continues…for most people. The only reason why people continue to accept these bogus scientific theories is because they were raised to believe them. They never once question it for fear of being laughed at and ridiculed by the other kids raised in that environment of scientific agendas. In my opinion, it’s a form of child abuse to cram this crap down kid’s throats. Why not just teach them to believe in spaghetti monsters, or pink unicorns? After all, you can’t prove that they DON’T exist.
I really cannot think of one reason to believe that photons exist. I have never seen, felt, heard, tasted, or smelt one. They are completely absent from my sense perception. And why shouldn’t they be? After all, they are massless (isn’t that convenient). At least that’s what they tell us. This way they don’t have to actually show us a photon. They can just show us some experimental effect, and then attribute that effect to a photon. But I could just as easily make up my own cause for the observed effect. Maybe a mass-less leprechon is responsible for knocking an electron off a piece metal. Did you ever think of that?
The ability to demonstrate how a photon acts contradicts the physicist’s own Heisenberg uncertainty principle which states that it is impossible to simultaneously measure the position and momentum of particles that exist on the quantum level (as if they even exist at all). The accuracy of one must be sacrificed for the other. Thus, the ability to explain the nature of photon, and by extension its very existence, eludes even those most dedicated to the scientific agenda.
Once you point these problems out, the typical science zealot will try to obfuscate the issue by bringing up the particle/wave duality of the photon. So now I’m supposed to believe that a photon can act as both a particle AND a wave? Those are two completely different things for crying out loud. What a bunch of metaphysical hocus pocus. But alas, that is all we’re left with. Why? Because they feel a certain necessity to explain the nature of light.
The fear of not understanding the nature of light motivates them to come up with an explanation even if that explanation takes us to the brink of insanity. I believe that we have the ability to someday demonstrate the very nature of light, and just because that day hasn’t come yet doesn’t mean we should force upon ourselves, and our children, a bogus theory rooted in insecurity and overactive imaginations.
The day will soon come that we will have a legitimate explanation for the nature of light, and when that day comes, I will be quietly sipping from my cosmic tea cup, and smiling.